I’m often asked by clients whether they should buy a compact or DSLR (digital single-lens reflex) camera, and what are the pros and cons of each device.
It comes down to several factors – what type of photographer are you? What sort of quality are you after? How much do you want to spend?
The most obvious advantages that a compact have over a DSLR are size and price. Some high-end compact cameras are very small, with reasonable functionality, and they are priced to move, while a DSLR is definitely more bulkier and can be priced in the $1000+ bracket.
When it comes to functionality, you can see there are differences when you put them side-by-side. A DSLR is bigger than your average compact camera because it has a lot more features. Your average compact will have a flash, and a zoom in and zoom out function, plus a little bit of storage, plus a view finder. However, a DSLR will have ISO settings, the ability to change out lenses, some have built-in editing software, plus – one of the most important parts – it has a bigger sensor. This latter part means the device gathers light easier making it more light sensitive – which is a good thing if you are more serious about photography. Basically, the DSLR is a lot more feature-heavy than its compact counterpart.
And this brings us to the main difference between a compact and a DSLR. Features and price aside, the real reason a person would choose one over the other is usage. If you are one of those people who like taking happy snaps of friends and family while on holiday, or just have a cursory interest in taking pics, then the compact is ideal. If, however, you take more time setting up shots, like to experiment a little, or have ambitions to have a career in photography, then a DSLR is a great starting point.